The ancient Greek poet, Euripides (480 -406 BC) once said, “One can judge a man by the company they keep.” Once you read about the connection between Fr. Bryan Hehir, Jim Wallis (who founded and leads an organization with anti-Catholic views called the Sojourners), George Soros, and the pro-abortion, pro-gay Democratic National Committee, we’ll invite you to revisit the Euripides quote and see if it applies. Here’s the situation in a nutshell:
Jim Wallis and his organization have gotten financial support from athiest George Soros and are friends of the Left. Not only that, but Jim Wallis is a “a guy who believes a lot of the stuff that Jeremiah Wright does. He is a blatant redistribution of wealth advocate, a Marxist.” (March 24, 2010 report quoting Glenn Beck). Sojourners also holds or supports anti-Catholic views. It seems that Fr. Bryan Hehir associates himself with Wallis and has spoken at one of the Sojourners’ events. Beyond that, Fr. Hehir’s comment on a panel with Wallis that Hehir respects the Democratic National Committee (which vehemently opposes the Catholic Church on key issues like abortion and gay marriage) validates the kinds of questions about Fr. Hehir that we have been raising for some time. Let’s tackle each one of these separately.
Jim Wallis and his organization have gotten financial support from George Soros, are friends of the Left, and hold anti-Catholic views
Deal Hudson at InsideCatholic.com just posted earlier this week about how George Soros and his Open Society Foundation have been funding Jim Wallis and his organization, the Sojourners. (We’ll get Fr. Bryan Hehir’s past or present association with Wallis and the Sojourners in a moment). According to Hudson:
The funding from Soros’ foundation, The Open Society, was revealed by Marvin Olasky in World magazine. This is the same foundation that provided six-figure funding to Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Catholics United. Both organizations are important Catholic voices in the Wallis-led coalition, and both have fully supported Obama’s pro-abortion agenda from the start.
Wallis is denying he receives support from Soros even though Jay W. Richards, author of the NRO post, has screen shots of the relevant pages from the Open Society web site showing grants of $200,000 in 2004 and $25,000 in 2006. Dalyrmple posted PDFs from the Open Society web site on August 12 only to find they were removed a few days later.
On August 18, Wallis and Sojourners finally confirmed the Soros/Open Society funding, which also included previously undisclosed $100,000 in 2006.
Mr. Hudson refers to a piece in National Review which says:
Now, it isn’t news that both Sojourners and Wallis are friends of the Left; I explored the connections in my book Money, Greed and God, and others have connected the dots as well. But were Wallis and Sojourners actively involved with secular left-wing mega-donors and with the election machinery of the Left?
This article in In World magazine from July 17, partially answers that question by referencing a 2007 Washingon Post report that Wallis’s organization, Sojourners, loaned/rented Sojourners’ mailing list to the Obama campaign.
Jim Wallis is a “a guy who believes a lot of the stuff that Jeremiah Wright does. He is a blatant redistribution of wealth advocate, a Marxist.” Sojourners also holds or supports anti-Catholic views
Jim Wallis is in the news a lot. His own biography on Sojourners website describes him as “bestselling author, public theologian, speaker, and international commentator on ethics and public life.” He is President Obama’s spiritual advisor and a policy advisor. What are his views you might ask?
Earlier this month, Paul Melanson at LaSalette Journey blogged on this exact topic and Fr. Bryan Hehir’s relationship with Wallis. In Paul’s post, “Why would Father J. Bryan Hehir choose to associate himself with such a leftist radical”, he said:
In a previous post I showed how Father J. Bryan Hehir of the Boston Archdiocese has associated himself with leftist radical Jim Wallis and his organization Sojourners (which has been financed by Nazi collaborator George Soros) and which promotes the New Age Globalist Earth Charter which seeks to replace the Ten Commandments and dismantle the Roman Catholic Church.
Jim Wallis, in his book entitled “The Great Awakening,” expresses his support for homosexual unions and even spiritual “blessings” for such unions. He writes, “I support civil rights laws for same-sex couples. That, for me, is a justice issue…Gay marriage should not be the primary battleground in the fight for the health and stability of marriage and family in our society. In a pluralistic democracy, we should support civil and human rights for all our citizens, regardless of our different theological and biblical interpretations of the complicated and thorny issues surrounding homosexuality.Needless to say, this attitude is not consistent with the Magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church.
Here are a few excerpts from Paul’s previous post on Jim Wallis:
He wasn’t just against the Vietnam war, he rejoiced in America’s defeat there showing his leftist sympathies by publicly criticizing the Vietnamese and Hmong refugees who fled that communist regime…Wallis also supported the Sandinista Communists in their attempt to take over Nicaragua in the 80s, actively participating in resistance against the American military – AND working side by side in this cause with none other than Jeremiah Wright, the radical anti-American Chicago preacher who was our president’s pastor for twenty years.
In addition, Wallis supported the FMLN, a communist terror group from El Salvador itching to spread their Marxist revolution throughout South America. Men have been called ‘traitors’ for much less than what Wallis has stood for.
In 1983, the organization, Accuracy in Media published a lengthy book on the far left policies of Wallis and his organization, documenting 53 political positions of Sojourners on such issues as Israel’s right to exist, terrorism, socialism, capitalism, human rights, etc. In all 53 position statements, it was found that Sojourners’ views were completely in line with the views of hard-line Soviets.
Wallis believes that Castro’s Cuba, Chavez’s Venezuela, and Ortega’s Nicaragua are the Marxist paradises the US should emulate...So, after being arrested by the US government 22 times in forty years, where has he soft-landed? As spiritual advisor to President Obama. Now, with the help of our own government, he hopes to turn mere ideology into policy. He is a living, breathing advocate for total government control, complete socialism, or ‘totalitarian socialism.’” (See here for full article).
Sojourners is behind the “Call to Renewal” movement, a movement supported by Father J. Bryan Hehir of the Boston Archdiocese. The question is: why would a Roman Catholic priest wish to associate himself with a radical such as Jim Wallis? Especially since Sojourners promotes the New Age Globalist Earth Charter, an initiative which seeks to replace the Ten Commandments and to neutralize the Catholic Church.
Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI have criticized the beliefs underlying the Earth Charter. Here is an excellent article where you can read more.
Not to be forgotten is this overview of Wallis (from Discoverthenetworks, a guide to the political left), which cites how Wallis is a dedicated foe of capitalism and contends Biblical scripture calls for redistribution of wealth to help the poor:
To this day, Wallis remains fiercely opposed to capitalism and the free market system. In many interviews, he has stressed his belief that capitalism has proven to be an unmitigated failure. “Our systems have failed the poor and they have failed the earth.”
In 1995 Wallis founded Call to Renewal, a coalition of religious groups united in the purpose of advocating, in religious terms, for leftist economic agendas such as tax hikes and wealth redistribution to promote “social justice.”
More than a mere religious leader, Wallis, a registered Democrat, is also an adroit political operative, publicly portraying himself as a politically neutral religious figure whose overriding allegiance is to God. Always with the disclaimer that neither major political party can claim to authoritatively represent the values of religious faith, Wallis passionately contends that Republican policies tend to be immoral and godless.
After the 2004 presidential election, Wallis acknowledged that he had cast a vote for the Democratic candidate, John Kerry. In January 2005, Senate Democrats invited Wallis to address them in a private discussion. Meanwhile, some fifteen Democratic members of the House made Wallis the guest of honor at a breakfast confab whose subject, according to The New York Times, was devising ways to instill support for the Democratic Party into the hearts of the religious faithful.
In a January 13, 2006 radio interview with Interfaith Voices, Wallis was asked, “Are you then calling for the redistribution of wealth in society?” He replied, “Absolutely, without any hesitation. That’s what the gospel is all about.”
According to a March 10, 2007 Los Angeles Times report, in recent years Wallis has sought to re-brand traditional slogans of the religious right, like ”pro-life,” to refer to such leftist agendas as working with AIDS victims in Africa or helping illegal immigrants in America achieve legal status so they can continue to live with their U.S.-born children.
Fr. Bryan Hehir associates himself with Wallis and has spoken at a Sojourner event
Fr. Hehir spoke at Wallis’ Sojourners conference, “A Table in the Wilderness” in 1997, along with Wallis. As Cabinet Secretary for Social Services, Fr. Hehir has also spoken on a number of panels with Jim Wallis in recent years. In April of 2004, they both keynoted this Social Justice Conference in Richmond, Virginia. Here’s Jim Wallis at the Boisi Center at Boston College in October 2005, where Fr. Bryan Hehir is on the Board of Advisors. Here’s Fr. Hehir, Jim Wallis, and Mary Jo Bane on a April 2005 Harvard panel on the future of religion and politics. On March 5 of this year, Fr. Hehir and Jim Wallis were together again at a forum at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.
Fr. Hehir’s comment on a panel that he respects the Democratic National Committee (which vehemently opposes the Catholic Church on key issues like abortion and gay marriage) valides the of questions about Fr. Hehir we have been raising for some time
One of the more interesting panels where Fr. Hehir and Jim Wallis spoke together was on January 18, 2005 at the Brookings Institute in Washington, DC. In this transcript of the event, Fr. Hehir commented that he was finished reading all but 3 chapters of Wallis’s latest book (“”God’s Politics: Why the Right Gets it Wrong and the Left Doesn’t Get It”), and agreed with a number of conclusions, but said he “would have gotten there a different way.” How Fr. Hehir responded to his introduction at this panel was also noteworthy. The moderator, E.J. Dionne, Jr, who introduced Fr. Hehir at the session described him as “one of the most insightful thinkers we have on the relation between faith and public life.” He joked that Fr. Hehir had always been his candidate to be pope, but since he didn’t want to jinx that possibility, he said, “maybe I should nominate Bryan for a job he doesn’t want, which is to be chair of the Democratic National Committee, and then he might get to be pope.” Fr. Hehir responded,
I feel the need at Brookings to make a sort of presidential statement, that I aspire neither to the papacy nor the head of the Democratic National Committee. I respect the Democratic National Committee and I reverence the papacy, but others can do both of those.”
OK, so readers may say we have a thing about words here, but words matter. It’s common knowledge that many of the DNC’s positions stridently oppose Catholic Church teachings. The DNC’s 2004 platform clearly supported abortion (“we stand proudly for a woman’s right to choose”), embryonic stem cell research (“We will pursue this research”) and opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment that would have blocked gay marriage from spreading (“We support full inclusion of gay and lesbian families in the life of our nation and seek equal responsibilities, benefits, and protections for these families. We repudiate President Bush’s divisive effort to politicize the Constitution by pursuing a “Federal Marriage Amendment.”). Maybe Fr. Hehir was just bantering with the moderator in his comment. But his statement that he respected the DNC was not followed by any other statement that qualified he did not mean that, so that raises questions. Is this blog the right place to ask how any faithful Catholic could say he respected the DNC in the face of them holding and espousing these anti-Catholic positions?
So, what have we learned today? We have George Soros funding Jim Wallis’ organization, the Sojourners. We have seen Jim Wallis’ record of left-leaning Marxist views and the sort of causes and positions the Sojourners support and espouse, including ones contrary to Catholic teachings. We have seen that Fr. Bryan Hehir spoke at a Sojourners conference and has spoken on a lot of panels with Jim Wallis, so some people might infer some association between Fr. Hehir and Jim Wallis that goes beyond just happenstance. We have Fr. Hehir on a panel with Wallis saying he agreed with many of the conclusions of Wallis’s latest book on religion and politics–and that Fr. Hehir respects the Democratic National Committee, with no comment about the fact that the DNC opposes the Church on issues like abortion, embryonic stem cell research, and gay marriage.
We come back to the Euripides quote: “One can judge a man by the company they keep.” Do you think it might apply in this case?
Of course you can judge a man by who he associates with. Birds of a feather flock together! I believe from what people have shared with me that Bryan Hehir is probably an operative of the Democratic National Committee. You may want to check and see if he has ever helped the DNC, and if so, to what extent.
Clearly he agrees with Sojourner’s positions. If he didn’t, he wouldn’t associate himself with the movement. That alone warrants an investigation into his activities. If a priest were to speak at an event conducted by Aryan Nation and to write articles for their publications, what conclusion would we have to draw?
This has nothing to do with rash judgment. Only solid common sense.
Thank you Joe for this detailed post. Jim Wallis is a very disturbing individual. But even more disturbing is Fr. Bryan Hehir’s association with Wallis’ organization Sojourners, which is funded by a one-time Nazi collaborator and leftist extremist.
I find it astonishing that the Archdiocese has not acted on the copious documentation which BHE has compiled. This in itself would suggest that something rather sinister is going on in Boston.
More than ever, faithful Catholics need to offer deliverance prayers for a local Church which has seemingly lost its way:
http://www.patriotledger.com/lifestyle/faith/x686836229/Boston-Archdiocese-defrocks-2-priests
Regarding the judgment of Fr. Hehir. In the end it is God’s judgment that is the essential one.
But in the mean time as we travel through time as Catholic faithful we look to Jesus and the Magisterium for truth and guidance. In an earlier time The Church used terms to describe those who make the Church into something it is not. This from the Canon 751; Heresy is the obstinate (stubborn) post-baptismal denial of some truth that must be believed with divine and Catholic faith.
Could anybody dispute that this assessment applies to Fr. Hehir on several counts?
It is like you meet the guy on the 8th hole and ask him how is his golf game and he say’s “Golf?, I was just walking in the meadow with this odd looking walking stick” We’d love to give the guy the benefit of a doubt, but that walking stick looks exactly like my 3 wood. And he is walking with three golfers in a foursome. If he is not golfing (hanging out with and cooperating with sworn enemies of the Church) than what the heck is he doing there?
This tact is relativism and falls under the Heresy of Modernism.
Lets just be honest OK?
The liberal drivel and intellectual gymnastics a la 1973 has run its course.
The Cardinal could simply settle this whole matter quite easily.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFfyzly9Rbo
Anonymous wrote, “This tact is relativism and falls under the Heresy of Modernism.”
That Bryan Hehir could have such standing in the Church is indicative of a pervasive abandonment of clear thinking. This is the product of the New Theology (von Balthasar, de Lubac, Rahner) and theological pluralism, i.e., reducing St. Thomas Aquinas to merely one among many theologians. (see http://www.waragainstbeing.com ) And, yes, this is the fruit of Modernism, condemned by Pope St. Pius X.
The Church is in the throes of death, but there is hope. Pray that Our Lady, who alone has destroyed all heresies, will have pity on us.
And let’s not forget the demonic element. How many priests in the Archdiocese are engaging in homosexuality? How many have dissented from Church teaching? How many arrested for the sexual abuse of children? How many defrocked now? How many get drunk or use drugs?
This is not the fruit of the Holy Spirit. It is the work of the Father of lies (John 8: 44).
I’ve not seen such character assassination, misrepresentation of views, out of context quotes, poor theology, and downright meaness in a religious context since we lost Jerry Falwell. Way to go, conservatives.
Jim,
The blog has never been about liberal VS conservative catholic views. It is about orthodoxy VS modernism.
Could you get yourself up to speed on the issues at hand and dispute specific claims you find are in error if there are any?
Gee Jim, how profound. You wouldn’t care to elaborate would you? I’d like some specifics of “bad theology” to begin with. Perhaps you will enlighten us with your razor-sharp skills in theology. Aren’t abortion and homosexuality sins any more?
Downright meaness? You’re the one dishonoring the dead. Out of context quotes? Again, could you provide one example? I mean that’s not asking very much is it? Misrepresentation of views? Again, examples Jim.
Surely one as enlightened as yourself should be able to provide us with some evidence to corroborate your claims?
Jim? While you’re at it, perhaps you ask Fr. Erikson why he never responded to the numerous requests to explain how this site has issued “inaccurate” statements while “cruelly disparaging” Father Hehir?
I know you’re up to the task. And so we await your case.
And now Jim goes silent. Gee, I’m really surprised!
I just have better things to do. Thanks to all for putting the UN in UNchristian.
Better things to do? That didn’t stop you from coming here to engage in falsehood Jim. That you are unwilling (or unable) to back up your assertions with hard evidence says it all. Like officials of the Archdiocese, you have difficulty telling the truth.
We are still waiting for Fr. Erikson to provide us with examples of “inaccurate” posts and “cruel disparagement” of Fr. Bryan Hehir.
I guess we’ll be waiting a long time huh Jim?